I don't see the paradox in Global Consequentialism

Global consequentialism states that

• the moral decision procedure is determined by the actual consequences of an action
• the moral wrongness is determined directly by the actual consequences of the action
• moral sanctions are applied only if it brings out the greatest good

Hence we can see in this situation that there can exist a paradox when a moral action has to be executed. This is because

• How can action be right and and yet the agent has to be blamed at the same time?

But then right, I can think of a situation where Global Consequentialism works:

Someone might murder another person because it brings out the greatest good, but it will bring out even better good if he is blamed.

Does that make sense?

Download Essay 2